The Land Cruiser’s pre-crash front seatbelts will tighten automatically in the event the vehicle detects an impending crash, improving protection against injury significantly. The Rogue doesn’t offer pre-crash pretensioners.
The Land Cruiser has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Rogue doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Land Cruiser. But it costs extra on the Rogue.
The Toyota Land Cruiser offers an optional Multi-Terrain Monitor and it also offers an optional rear camera washer to make backing always safe, regardless of road dirt or grime, while the Nissan Rogue doesn’t offer a camera washer, requiring manual cleaning.
Both the Land Cruiser and Rogue have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the Land Cruiser has Parking Support Brake (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Rogue’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the Land Cruiser and the Rogue have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The Toyota Land Cruiser weighs 1623 to 1968 pounds more than the Nissan Rogue. The NHTSA advises that heavier vehicles are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Land Cruiser is safer than the Nissan Rogue:
|
Land Cruiser |
Rogue |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
205 |
261 |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
238 |
319 |
Neck Compression |
84 lbs. |
103 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Land Cruiser is safer than the Nissan Rogue:
|
Land Cruiser |
Rogue |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
25 |
95 |
Chest Movement |
.3 inches |
.4 inches |
Abdominal Force |
82 lbs. |
99 lbs. |
Hip Force |
109 lbs. |
339 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
19 |
162 |
Spine Acceleration |
20 G’s |
31 G’s |
Hip Force |
217 lbs. |
513 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.