The Corolla has standard Whiplash Injury Lessening Seats, which use a specially designed seat to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash Injury Lessening Seats system allows the backrest to travel backwards to cushion the occupants and the headrests move forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Integra doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
The Corolla has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Integra doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Both the Corolla and the Integra have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available blind spot warning systems and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Corolla is safer than the Acura Integra:
|
Corolla |
Integra |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
187 |
231 |
Neck Injury Risk |
27% |
27% |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
330/310 lbs. |
287/574 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Corolla is safer than the Acura Integra:
|
Corolla |
Integra |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
92 |
145 |
Chest Movement |
.9 inches |
.9 inches |
Abdominal Force |
129 lbs. |
226 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
137 |
239 |
Spine Acceleration |
43 G’s |
60 G’s |
Hip Force |
367 lbs. |
531 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Spine Acceleration |
32 G’s |
45 G’s |
Hip Force |
623 lbs. |
646 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Toyota Corolla is safer than the Integra:
|
Corolla |
Integra |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
113 |
160 |
Neck Tension |
178 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
89 lbs. |
312 lbs. |
Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
870 lbs. |
959 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
131 |
258 |
Neck Compression |
22 lbs. |
112 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.34 in |
1.46 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
14 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
469 lbs. |
602 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |